Violet Thursdays

Feminist. Vegan. Boston. Crafty. Curious.
(love: hula hooping, eating my fruits and vegetables, spelling, playing, listening, enjoying my surroundings, noticing patterns, anagrams, singing, arguing, weaving, felting, embroidery, building forts and wreaking havoc, hesitating, changing my hair color, and thinking myself into paralysis.)
In reserving the category of “fashion” exclusively for certain kinds of white Western bourgeois styles of dress and personhood, the fashion elite have hijacked the term. Styles and practices of dress not sanctioned by the fashion elite are relegated to the broad category of “non-fashion,” which includes everything from outdated clothing styles to “ethnic garb.” In this binary logic, “fashion” is the sign of Western modernity, innovation, dynamism, and choice (a point Myers emphasizes so strongly) and non-fashion is the sign of the unmodern, the uninnovative, the static, and the oppressed. People associated with non-fashions like, say “ethnic garb,” are imagined as “traditional” subjects who lag behind or are situated outside of the modern West. Fraught Intimacies: Fashion & Feminism (The Director’s Cut) | threadbared